1998 Volkswagen Polo CL 1.4

Summary:

It is economical to run, but parts are expensive and it is not as solidly built as the pre-Seat VW's

Faults:

Exhaust back box blew at 42,000 miles.

Squeaks from dashboard around radio.

Brake shoes, discs and pads replaced at 46,000 miles from a non-VW garage.

Rear light goes on and off intermittently at times.

Difficult to select gears at 48,000 miles. After paying out nearly £60 to a VW dealer car was OK for about a day then gear selection was clunky again.

Water pump failed leaving the fan heater blowing cold air when turned on to hot setting-replaced by VW for £144.

General Comments:

Car is very economical.

My experience of three different VW dealers is that customer service is poor, once they've sold the car they're not interested in you, and service department staff tend to be arrogant.

My car was returned damaged after a service from a particular VW dealership. Their technician denied any wrongdoing and the dealership maintained that the technician would not need to access that part of the car even though I knew that the on-board computer for fault diagnosis (part of 20,000 mile service) was located there.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 13th December, 2004

1998 Volkswagen Polo 1.9 D CL 1.9 diesel

Summary:

Reliable family transport with disappointing quality

Faults:

Heated rear window needed rewiring.

A couple of glowplugs failed.

General Comments:

Good, reliable runabout with excellent fuel economy. 52 mpg average so far. It's a one owner car from new, owned by people we know well (I actually dropped them off at the VW dealer when they bought it new), and with a full VW service history.

Performance is not exactly sprightly, although the big 1.9 litre diesel is quite torquey and makes the car feel lively enough for most situations.

The build quality is disappointing and despite just 57,000 miles, the dash is very rattly and there are squeaks from all over the interior on a bumpy road. VW build quality is not what it was, and dare I say not really any better than cheaper rivals.

Holds the road well, but you'd never particularly enjoy yourself in it, which is one area most rivals are better than the Polo. But it was reliable economical family transport we were after and the Polo has delivered it. Just don't expect much else.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th December, 2004

1998 Volkswagen Polo L 1.4 i

Summary:

A Great all rounder

Faults:

Near side front door leak (replaced door membrane)

Steering geometry reset after hitting a pot hole.

Brake servo hose replaced (no charge as it was a recall by VW)

General Comments:

Very good car, plenty fast enough on the motorway.

1st gear a little short, but bags of acceleration in 2nd and 3rd esp. if you let it rev between 3000-4000 RPM.

It has electric heated mirrors which seams a little strange as it has no pas or c/l.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 29th January, 2003

1998 Volkswagen Polo CL 1.6

Summary:

A bit overpriced, but it has been very reliable

Faults:

Virtually nothing has gone wrong with this car.

1st and reverse gear selection difficult when new, but fixed under warranty - small adjustment to linkage.

Replaced front discs and pads plus 2 new tyres at 31,000 miles.

Dark blue metallic paint prone to showing scratches.

Rattles from stereo mounting.

General Comments:

Not particularly fast for a 1.6 but economy is 40+ mpg. Engine pulls well without being flogged.

OK even on motorway, but a bit noisy at speed. Seats comfortable for long journeys.

Handling not brilliant. Rolls a lot on corners. Tends to understeer too readily in the wet.

No real complaints. we get it serviced at a non-franchised VW specialist since the warranty expired because of excessive dealer costs.

Feels like it will go on forever.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 20th November, 2002

1998 Volkswagen Polo CL 1.9 diesel

Summary:

Over priced, over rated

Faults:

Clutch failed after we'd driven 3,000 miles onto the 27,000 we bought the car with.

Steering misaligned at purchase, (wheels were changed from alloys to original V.W. at garage, but the geometry was not re done), hence tyres worn to metal at first M.O.T. - failed M.O.T., (motor operations test).

Faulty fuel filter fitted at 40,000 miles service caused breakdown.

Rusting in several places through manufacturing faults.

General Comments:

Nice to drive - steady and predictable.

Comfortable, spacious interior.

Build quality nowhere near as good as generally perceived.

Good fuel economy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 16th April, 2002