1995 Volvo 440 SE 1.9 TD
Summary:
A good car that offers more than you realise
Faults:
The rear left hand central locking motor failed at about 64500 miles.
At 72000 miles the alternator failed.
There are a few minor bits of rust to the rear of the car, though nothing major.
Central locking occasionally fails to lock all doors on the car.
General Comments:
The car has proven to be a very solid buy.
While it may not be everyones idea of a good car, it has been reliable, and surprisingly quick.
It is a very understated car, that usually goes unnoticed, not that it deserves it, and not that it isn't good looking. It is traditional Volvo styling, but has the first signs of the modern Volvos in its styling.
I have been very pleasantly surprised by the driving experience offered, and particularly by the sense of safety it affords.
It is not a car to woo the ladies in, but more a car for those who need a cheap, reliable car that can get them from A to B comfortably, and respectably.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 17th August, 2002
11th Jan 2001, 16:07
My dad has a 440 Si 2.0 petrol. At first we didn't like it, when I saw it my opinion didn't change much, then I drove it... It's a great car to drive, the dash is great and it feels so safe.
The heated seats are a damn good novelty. The rear seats are so comfy too and spacious.
The engine is forever reliable and economical - a 213 mile trip to Manchester and back used about 4-5 gallons of petrol.
Let's see the performance:
BMW 520 SE
106 bhp/tonne
0-6 10.2 seconds
41 mpg at cruise
Volvo 440 2.0 Si
105 bhp/tonne
48 mpg
I'm sorry but the badge doesn't mean anything to me!!!
My dad always wanted a Mercedes, but he's chosen his next car as the S40 2.0t.