1998 Volvo S40 SE 2.0
Summary:
Too much to pay for it's performance
Faults:
No problems have so far occured on the car.
General Comments:
This car is a terrible performer.
It is slow and bulky.
Performances are poor to average.
Handling is OK - actually gets better in the wet.
Gets better in terms of power when up to 90 mph - engine sounds better and more relaxed.
Dealers have always been good.
Car needs to be quicker, much quicker, have better handling.
It deserves to compete with the likes of Saab and BMW, but it can't because its too slow.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 30th July, 2004
10th Feb 2004, 12:26
Depending on how old an S40 and the engine that's fitted to it, there seem to be two major types of manual gearbox:
One sort has reverse indicated on the shift pattern as being left of 1st. This gearbox is notchy, vague and generally poor.
One sort has reverse located below 5th on the shift pattern.
This gearbox is much smoother and precise.
It seems to vary as to which gearbox you get - generally, the bigger the engine and the newer the car, the more likely you are to have the second (better) gearbox.