2001 Volvo S60 SE 2.0T
Summary:
You get a lot of car for your money, but don't expect it to be worth much when you sell it on
Faults:
Front lower suspension bushes failed.
Top engine mount failed
Main brake master cylinder failed (both circuits!)
Alarm played up
Door locks failed
Chewed up edges of front tyres.
General Comments:
I bought this car knowing that it had it's foibles but didn't think they would all hit me. Sure enough the door locks played up and I had to replace the lower wishbone bushes along with the upper engine mount. Neither were hugely expensive jobs, but in a car only 4 years old and from a manufacturer as Volvo I expected a little better quality.
That said, I have never driven a more comfortable car over long distances. I drove it non stop back from the Lake district to the South Coast. The car is a very nice place to be in and is very well built from a passenger point of view. The seats are amazingly comfortable and the cabin well designed although not in such a contemporary way as a BMW or Mercedes.
The worst thing about the car though was the depreciation. The spec of the car I bought was around £25k when new. I bought it 4 years later for £9k and struggled to get near £4k 2 1/2 years later on a trade in.
The fuel consumption was not great, around 28mpg generally which was the main reason we sold the car for a diesel engined car. You could get up to 35mpg on a gentle motorway run, but you had to have a light right foot. If I had the chance to re think I would have gone for the D5 model.
Unfortunately Volvo do not have the badge prestige to hold values which is a shame. The car is fundamentally vary good and I enjoyed driving it and was sad to see it go. I would consider another Volvo, but only if the depreciation issues were not so much of a factor.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Review Date: 31st October, 2007
3rd Jul 2005, 11:10
I am reassured by your comments, as yourself just bought 2001 car with 78000 miles and the car drives and looks new.