1986 Chevrolet Sprint Base 2 dr 1.0 carb from North America
Summary:
The 1986 Chevy Sprint had minor weaknesses, but was a better economy car than anything offered since
Faults:
Exhaust not durable as it should have been.
Brake caliper float bushings needed refinement.
Windshields cracked from heat inside - ice outside.
ER motor not as durable as standard motor.
Automatic transmission model not viable.
Susceptible to rust out of body and front clip frame.
General Comments:
Perfect ratios on 5 speed transmission.
40 mpg at 75+ mph with 5 speed (50 mpg at 55 mph)
Remarkable traction on packed snow/ice with OE Bridgestones.
Lots of cargo room with seat folded down.
Full sized spare tire.
Fuel filler on left where it should be in USA.
200,000 mile durability under easy driving, slightly less driven hard.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Review Date: 1st July, 2008
6th Oct 2008, 20:12
I may be getting my 1986 Chevy Sprint ER back from one of my relatives soon.
I had it from 1988 to 1991 (second owner) and then gave it to my mother. She drove it for about seven years and then gave it to my sister. My sister still has it running, but it has apparently been sluggish recently.
I loved this little car -- the hatchback was really good for payload, believe it or not. I was able to carry a portable washer, then dryer in it. I carried a love seat, and then a LARGE recliner in it.
Only the owners of these little gems have any idea what wonderful little cars they truly are/were. My maximum MPG? A full 60 MPG, and that was not driving while being careful. I was a 70 MPH driver most of the time. I also kept meticulous records and calculated mileage to the hundredths. I got 55 MPG for most situations.
And yes, they keep going, provided you take care of them. Don't give the credit to GM, though. This is a Suzuki-built car.