2009 Citroen C3 Picasso VTR+ turbo diesel from UK and Ireland
Summary:
Unreliable
Faults:
Driver's door seal corroded.
Anti pollution fault, DPF filter.
Water ingress in fusebox.
General Comments:
Please, please, please do not buy a C3 Picasso. I fell in love with it when it came out and hoped it would be a perfect replacement for my old Xsara Picasso.
The good:
It's very roomy, visibility is fantastic, it's reasonably economical and it looks good too.
The bad:
The ride is not that great, a bit on the firm side. The gearing doesn't seem to be that great, the change is a bit notchy and vague, and at usual speeds (30, 50, 70 mph) it never quite feels like the right gear. Change up and it feels a bit bogged down, or don't and it feels a bit noisy and over revved.
The ugly:
This has been by some distance the most unreliable car I have ever owned. Repeated anti pollution display fault caused by DPF filter clogging, and then the lights failing due to water getting in the fusebox, needing a replacement and a replacement wiring loom with a £1000 bill. Apparently a common fault.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 17th September, 2015
24th Oct 2013, 03:10
The C3 Picasso was not a replacement for the Xsara Picasso, the C4 Picasso was.
Still, it's disappointing to see that you weren't keen on it.
I drive/have driven a number of older and new Citroens (work at a franchise) and have had 2 Xsara Picassos as company cars... and for me, the C3 Picasso is vastly superior to drive. A little smaller yes, a little less roomy, but much more of an enjoyable car to drive. I also find the 90bhp 1.6 HDI is much more willing than the 2.0 90 unit in the previous model, as well as more economical.
The C4 Picasso is the real replacement for the Xsara; much closer in terms of space and size.