2004 | ||
Tacuma CDX 2.0 petrolGood value, cheap, reliable family motor 145 words, UK and Ireland | ||
2003 | ||
Tacuma SX unleaded 16vGreat 95 words, Singapore, 3 comments | ||
2002 | ||
Tacuma CDX 2 itreComfortable 41 words, Australia and New Zealand, 2 comments | ||
Tacuma Class (=CDX) 2.010 words, Netherlands | ||
Tacuma CX 1.6Value for space and stability. 105 words, Singapore | ||
2001 | ||
Tacuma SX 1.6Good MPV body, engine performance not great 133 words, UK and Ireland | ||
Tacuma SX 1.8The prices of the newdoes not reflect the expected quality, but comfortable and no problems. 141 words, Poland | ||
Tacuma SX 1.6 petrolA value for money MPV left unnoticed by the Hyundai Matrix 98 words, Singapore, 3 comments | ||
Tacuma SX 1.6Technology and quality at stone age levels 227 words, Belgium, 1 comment | ||
Tacuma CDX 2.0Excellent all round vehicle, and we would buy another one 175 words, UK and Ireland, 1 comment | ||
Tacuma CDX 2.0 16vA well packaged family car (well done Daewoo!!) 91 words, UK and Ireland, 4 comments | ||
2000 | ||
Tacuma CDX 2.0 petrolComfortable cheap motoring for 3 years 83 words, UK and Ireland | ||
