1968 Dodge Monaco 500 440 C.I. from North America
Summary:
It's an awesome land yacht!
Faults:
This car was restored in 2004 and neglected by 2 subsequent owners. Replaced starter and coil. Also repairs to engine wiring harness. Looks like the exhaust manifold gaskets and valve cover gaskets should be replaced also. Otherwise a solid straight car that runs down the road nicely. Not bad for a 40 year old classic!
General Comments:
This is my weekend cruiser. Originally a 383 car now with a 440 out of a 75 New Yorker.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 28th December, 2008
18th Jul 2010, 21:11
I wrote the original review for my 76 Royal Monaco in 2005. I still own the car with 60,000 miles on the odometer. I just had a safety inspection done on the car, and the mechanic says everything is OK. Since I've had antique plates on the car for the last five years, state inspections are not necessary.
The paint is now very thin and faded, mostly on the hood and trunk. The vinyl roof still looks good, along with the bumpers and chrome. The bottoms of the doors are quite rusted.
My problem is as follows; although a new paint job and bodywork would make this car look almost new, I have a problem spending that kind of money on a car that has almost no value. A recent classified priced a 77 Gran Fury (almost the same car) in excellent condition with 43K at $ 1995. This ad was in the paper for at least 3 weeks. I doubt it was sold.
So, do I spend at least that much for paint and bodywork, or do I just get rid of the car? I really am dubious about a discount paint job. I thought about attempting to paint the hood and trunk with close matching spray cans, but I shudder to think about such possible horrible results. I would hate to get rid of the car, though, having owned it for 34 years.
DPC.