1991 Ford Escort LX 1.8 diesel (no turbo) from UK and Ireland
Summary:
Don't even go there......
Faults:
Electrics, electrics, electrics, everything from the windows packing up, to the rev counter not working.
The car "dying" whilst pulling 90 mph on the M25, and then not coming back to life for 30 minutes.
Leaky sunroof.
4 fuel pumps in the last 100,000 miles.
Central locking decided to lock up all by itself, the list goes on and on...
General Comments:
Diesel, nice enough idea, but forget it if you don't have a turbo. This car "accelerates" from 0-60 mph in... (wait for it..) 17.4 seconds!
Trouble is, when you thrash it (in order to keep up with normal traffic) it's no more economical than a petrol car. So, it's true, there's no point in diesel motoring. I'm off to buy a nice petrol Rover or something......
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 3rd November, 2000
7th Apr 2001, 13:21
After having two Mk5 Escorts, I think I know a lot about them. I have to defend them. They are not trash. Firstly, I have to agree that the electrics are dodgy, especially the old barrel-lock central locking. After having two, I only ever came across two faults. One was the central locking that worked on it's own and a horn that decided to stick on. I completed 40,000 miles in the H reg one and a further 45,000 in the later 1992 K reg one. That is 95,000 miles of near trouble free motoring and both were only 1.4's as well. I found the performance perfectly acceptable and would cruise nicely all day (though under some pressure up hills). How has this person treated his Escort? I found Escorts of this time good, underestimated cars and I certainly would encourage my son to have one as a first car.