1985 Mercedes-Benz 190 D 2.5 2.5 diesel from Australia and New Zealand
Summary:
Substance exemplified: a bare bones diesel rocket, inspires total confidence
Faults:
Replaced old shock absorbers and various worn suspension bushes and rubbers etc. when purchased.
Fitted new water pump when purchased.
There is a minor leak in the automatic transmission, from a sensor plug, which unfortunately cannot be rectified without removing and dissembling the transmission to access the plug housing.
There is a sensor on the fan belt that disables the air conditioning when maximum power is required, and if belt slip is detected. The sensor malfunctioned, and required rectification.
General Comments:
This car is marvellous; at its best on the highway.
A beautiful drive. After 22 years and 275,000 kilometres, and a few dings and scrapes, there is not a single rattle.
It might be old technology to go without a turbo, but the 2.5 makes an excellent argument: at around 7 litres/100kms, clockwork reliability, and plenty of torque.
Not much glamour; all substance.
I strongly recommend picking one up!
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 16th May, 2007
30th Nov 2009, 07:00
I have a 1988 190d. It's done close on 400,000 and still does just under 8 litres to 100km. An absolutely wonderful car.
30th Nov 2009, 13:40
Hi I'm twenty and am the proud owner of a 91 E300 with the 3.0 liter inline six. I love my car, but what could be done to increase power as it is very slow. I don't race my cars and drive slower than most people, but I also have a 98' Crown Vic and the difference is night and day. I know the Benz will never be as fast as my V8 Vic, but I would at least like a little more power. Please help. Thanks!
11th Feb 2009, 10:44
A turbo adds stress to engine and excess heat... Turbodiesels require more effort to keep running... must change oil more often for turbo to last.. also cooling issues are greater..
I own a 85 190D with 2.2... Slow as hell.