1996 Subaru Impreza 2.2 from North America
Summary:
Cheaply made, with the exception of the very reliable engine
Faults:
Center differential went very bad. Expensive fix for a tiny problem (solenoid). Nearly impossible to drive without fixing.
The front control arms are puny, and I had a series of issues with alignment.
Everything that could leak, did leak.
Windows fell out of tracks.
Other, petty things that I forget.
General Comments:
It handled very, very well, and could get up and go if forced to (pedal to the floor, high RPM required).
However, it was generally sluggish and depressing to drive with an automatic transmission.
The car 'felt' cheap, like driving Tupperware.
Had the construction been more robust, I would have kept it.
Gas mileage was good, considering that the car is AWD. Averaged about 29 MPG.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Review Date: 15th March, 2012
6th Jul 2021, 16:22
You bought it at 16 years old with 120,000 on it... sound like it was good going. No cheap and nasty car would last this long. I live in the UK and car's like Fiat's get scrapped at only 8 years old. Now that is cheap and nasty Tupperware. Subaru were as good as any Japanese car (Honda, Toyota), especially in the 1990's.