2013 Toyota Tundra SR5 5.7 iForce from North America

Summary:

A specialist, not a generalist

Faults:

Battery went dead from extended non-use, not the truck's fault.

Windshield wipers needed to be replaced, a surprisingly painful experience at Advance Auto finding ones that fit.

An aftermarket brake light switch installed for trailer towing would heat up in the sun and randomly activate the brake lights even when just sitting in the driveway.

There seems to be a problem with the climate control buttons on the center console. The AC light is always on whenever any climate control option involving heat or cold is selected. You can't turn the AC off, although maybe that's just part of the climate control system. The air still blows warm if you select warm air, it's just that the AC light stays on. The rear defrost button doesn't seem to work, unless the truck has a sensor preventing it from turning on if it's too warm out.

General Comments:

I only have about 1,000 miles of experience on this Tundra, but for purposes of documenting the experience, I'm starting the review now so I can provide yearly updates. Probably next year's update will be more meaningful.

This 2013 Toyota Tundra SR5 Crewmax was a gift from a family member, who used it to tow a camper trailer. Hence the relatively low miles on a 10-year-old vehicle, which are dominantly highway towing miles.

Between my wife and I, we have 8 cars now counting this one. The summer weekend toys are a 1971 Barracuda, 1973 Charger, 1975 Charger, and 1979 Chevy C-10 so we like the '70s. Our "normal" cars are a 2017 Ford Explorer XLT, 2010 Cadillac DTS, and 2010 Honda Fit. Most of those cars have reviews on this site. Based on comparison with those vehicles, my driving impression of the Tundra is that it's like driving a commercial truck or piloting an ore freighter on the open sea. The thing is just huge, and I'm not altogether comfortable driving it. Backing up in a parking lot is a gamble because rear visibility is non-existent. The truck sits so high that you can't see what's behind you in the mirrors. There is a backup camera that helps somewhat, but no proximity alarm. There is also a major blind spot when changing lanes to the right, where I find I have to lean forward to scan the field of view in the passenger side mirror, and still have to physically look over my right shoulder through the rear passenger window to make sure nobody is alongside.

The truck rides really well on the highway; I drove it home at 65-70 mph all day and it was comfortable. The interior is very roomy, especially the back seats and huge rear doors of the Crewmax. It's high enough to really need to use the step bars to climb up or down into the cab. The engine has good power, the 4-wheel-drive engages and disengages fine. On the all-day drive home, at highway speeds the average gas mileage was 18 and 19 mpg, but at least that's on 87 octane. Still, it would be more economical to drive the Cadillac with its 4.6L V-8 that uses 93 octane, because it gets 10 mpg better. The Tundra is not an economical road trip cruiser. Perhaps it might get as high as 20 mpg doing 55 mph on a flat road.

So where are we? This is a vehicle made for towing heavy things, but too large to confidently drive in traffic or city streets, yet too small to be practical as a pickup, with fuel efficiency too poor to use as a casual passenger vehicle. Would I have bought a giant pickup for myself? No. It's a big truck with a towing package, so it was well suited to its job of pulling that camper trailer, but I'm not quite sure what other use it has. The pickup bed is only 5 1/2 feet long, so our '79 C-10 with an 8-foot bed is actually superior as a utility vehicle when you want to haul something, like even as simple as a 4'x8' sheet of plywood. Am I going to decline a free vehicle in good shape? No, we're going to find some niche for it. I have a feeling our use of this is going to be pretty limited for certain rare circumstances that our 7 other cars don't meet.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 11th April, 2023

24th Mar 2024, 18:33

This is the original reviewer with an approximate one-year update to my 2013 Toyota Tundra SR5 Crewmax. Since the last update, I have driven about 2,000 miles and the odometer now stands at 67,003 miles. As expected, use has been pretty limited with most of those miles being road miles just to keep everything in operating condition. We've used it as a pickup a couple of times. The 5 1/2-foot bed is a limitation for hauling some things, plus it has a hard shell tonneau cover on the bed so you can't have a bucket (that is, a front-loader bucket) of gravel dumped in. We've hauled a few saplings lying down in the bed and a few railroad ties for landscaping. The railroad ties stuck out past the end of the tailgate and a load of three made the rear end squat down noticeably. So, we use it as a pickup as best we can when the weather or distance isn't conducive to using the '79 Chevy C-10 with its 8-foot bed.

As far as an operating vehicle, it runs and drives great. My wife finds being a passenger to be uncomfortably bumpy, but then it is a real truck and not a car-based SUV so one expects the stiffer suspension. I'm convinced that the AC always being on is related to a problem I've read about with the center control panel where the rear defrost doesn't work and the AC light is always on regardless of temperature setting. However, that didn't seem to affect the heater or defroster when we used it on a few frosty days, though the rear defrost does not work. I have not dared to roll down the rear window. Maybe someday I'll have that fixed, or maybe not. Nothing else has broken. One of the gas struts for the tonneau became locked in the extended position and twisted the mounting bracket off when I tried to close it, but I don't blame that on the vehicle. A pair of new gas struts was $30 on Amazon, and I remounted the bracket with metal screws and JB Weld. It also looks like I will need new tires soon. These are likely to be the original tires with 67,000 miles and they are showing dry rot cracks between the treads and on some sidewalls. Again, I can't complain about a vehicle needing new tires at nearly 70,000 miles.

I've gotten a little more comfortable with driving the Tundra, but it's still a big truck that I have to treat with a lot of respect. That means pre-planning where to park so I don't have to back out of a parking spot and I still avoid heavy traffic where multiple lane changes might be required. Shortly after we first brought it home, I stupidly backed into a telephone pole, which bent the rear bumper up to interfere with opening the tailgate and also cracked the rear turn signal assembly. Very foolish. To my extreme surprise (and dismay), the bumper crumpled despite barely crawling. I suppose they are designed to do that. My first impulse was to use a body shop because to me this is a new vehicle, but they quoted $3,500 with a 3-month scheduling wait. So, I went online and ordered a new bumper and turn signal assembly at about 1/10th the cost and replaced them myself in a couple of hours. It was a good lesson for me, though, to be extremely careful when this thing starts moving. It's big, heavy, with poor visibility and going slow is the only way to compensate for that. Being heavy with truck tires, it also really chews up the ground after a rain. The lane to the garage gets torn up into a mudhole in a way that our other, lighter '70s era cars don't do.

So it seems to be a good vehicle, though not a vehicle I would have chosen for myself. Sort of like my Cadillac DTS, not a vehicle I would have bought for myself, but once it's in the family, I'm going to take care of it and appreciate its good points. Once something comes into my hands, particularly anything of a machinery nature, I have a tendency to take care of it and make sure it has a long life.