1996 Volkswagen Polo 1.0L petrol from UK and Ireland
Summary:
Slow Reliable Petrol Burner
Faults:
Connector on exhaust pipe just below the CAT (Don't know if it's meant to be there) decayed and leaked.
Distributor, I was told it seems to go in all of them.
But that is it.
General Comments:
For reliability this car could nearly be awarded top marks, in the space of time I had it, there was very little (low cost) things that went in it.
This car is a very bad handling car, nearly lost it a few times and I wasn't speeding. I was talking to a man that owns a large scrap yard, he said that it is very hard to get second hand front panels (i.e. bonnets, wings bumpers etc.) due to this reason.
The worst problem I had with this car was the fuel consumption, maybe it was the amount of miles on it, but I have a 1.6 car now and its lighter on petrol.
I wouldn't of minded this as much if the car was fast, but it certainly wasn't, it wouldn't pull you out of bed with its 45BHP.
All in all I can't complain too much about this car because it owed me nothing in the end. I got around (expensively) in this car with little problems.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 22nd August, 2007
30th Apr 2007, 06:44
Very good review: I have a 1996 1.6 GL and found your comments spot-on, although I found it strange that you mentioned not having anywhere to rest your foot after releasing the clutch -my car has a raised rest for the left foot which I find a real relief (for my poor foot!) afer having driven many cars with no such rest -it's a small thing, but makes all the difference on long journeys. Anyway, an excellant and reliable little runabout with a really gutsy little 8-valve that punches above it's weight.