1986 Volvo 240 240DL 2.3 Liter from North America
Summary:
Low tech and reliable
Faults:
This car is an anonomly. I bought it with only 30,000 miles on it.
After a few months, it began running really rough. A local mechanic couldn't figure out what to do. I thought it was going to to get expensive. My local Volvo dealer figured the problem out quickly. The mass air meter was shot.
A tune up and mass air meter later I was back up and running. Total cost: $600.
I'll keep you all informed about the upkeep costs I incur in the future. By all accounts, this is a good car. It runs as well as my Nissan did. It looks great. It just feels safer.
General Comments:
The downside is easy to find. This thing is boxy and slow. Plastic parts crumble and fall off daily. But it chugs along faithfully and cheerfully.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 1st June, 2003
25th Mar 2006, 00:01
I love my Volvo. I have only been driving it for about a year now myself, but I was a passenger for many years before then. I can truly support the longevity of these Swedes, my 1986 240 DL has 220000 miles and the odometer has been broken for the past 3 years. But while my reliable 240 is still a great car I am in college and I do find my car lacking in horsepower. I have been in several instances when my inability to accelerate has put me into some dangerous situations, especially with 5 people in the car. It is for this reason that I am beginning a project to revive the powerhouse of my stout yet lacking car with a Volvo engine of the same year and specs, but hopefully after tuning with ~160-180 horsepower. Hopefully some of these modifications and an engine rebuild will give me some better mpg too. I was looking into buying the new C30 for Volvo it looks really nice, but a little out of my price range and until I can get the money my 240 will get me wherever I need to go. Volvo for life.