1998 Volvo V70 R 2.3 turbo from North America
Summary:
Ultimately not worth the investment/costs to keep it in service
Faults:
Alternator.
Secondary air pump.
ABS/TRACs module.
Front struts - twice.
Radiator.
Thermostat / ECT.
Drive shaft.
Heater core - twice.
Sagging headliner.
Headlights (not oxidation on glass; the interior reflective material on the headlamps fades and requires replacement as there is no fix).
Door catch.
Liftgate struts.
Steering rack.
Turbo seals.
Final blow - transmission.
General Comments:
This car from 120,000 to 190,000 miles was a disaster. Lots of small issues and lots of bigger issues. Final issue was the transmission.
The prior owner was in the family and all work was done at the dealer prior to my ownership. And my work was done mostly at an independent Volvo-only shop. All preventative maintenance was always done on schedule including big jobs like PVC and timing belt/water pump.
Sadly this car just did not hold up as advertised. I was hoping to get to at least 200-250k miles with obviously some maintenance and some repairs. I got a lot of maintenance and repairs instead and made it to just under 190k miles before the transmission failed.
Considering the investment in repairs that I made, the decision to keep this car in the family was a mistake.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 25th January, 2016
1st Dec 2011, 16:21
PS Adding to my post above.
I consider the first two repairs to be part of the cost of purchase. This car had obviously been pampered by the prior owner, and was in pristine condition. Whenever I have purchased a used car, I put aside $1000 for a transmission flush, an oil change with full synthetic oil, and general repairs. With $150 for the rear hatch strut, and $265 for the broken motor mount, I came in under that budget. The $460 for the blower and $200 for the check engine light are the only two post-purchase repairs I've had. The $460 blower repair was big, but I consider anything under $250 to be minor.